• 1990 (Vol.4)
  • 1989 (Vol.3)
  • 1988 (Vol.2)
  • 1987 (Vol.1)

The method of canine odor visualization

© 2018 V.I. Krutova, E.P. Zinkevich

A. N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution RAS 119071 Moscow, Leninsky pr., 33

Received 14 Nov 2017

A fundamentally new method of smell evaluation, we called the method as a separate visualization is proposed on the ability of animals, particularly domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) to communicate signals between different modalities. We experimentally shown that those can be olfactory stimuli and indifferent at the beginning of the experiment visual signs. During the training, the abstract signs are given meaning. The solution to dog tasks olfactory recognition not directly smell, but through another modality we interpret as the possibility of symbolization of the sense of smell. This effect should be useful in solving a variety of tasks to study the cognitive abilities of dogs and their use of smell in the framework of the proposed method. Also confirmed the ability of dogs to the transfer of the generated rules for the identification of the smell when using unfamiliar olfactory stimuli.

Key words: cognitive capacities of dogs, symbolization of olfactory signals, methodological approaches to dog olfaction research

DOI: 10.7868/S023500921802004X

Cite: Krutova V. I., Zinkevich E. P. Metod kinologicheskoi vizualizatsii zapakha [The method of canine odor visualization]. Sensornye sistemy [Sensory systems]. 2018. V. 32(2). P. 145-153 (in Russian). doi: 10.7868/S023500921802004X

References:

  • Krutova V. I. Identifikatsia osobey po oboniatelnim signalam u nekotorikh vidov pozvonochnikh [Identification of individuals by olfactory cues in some species of vertebrates]. Avtoref. Diss. Cand. Biol. Sciences. M.: IEMEG. 1993. 24 p. (in Russian).
  • Krutova V. I. Ispolzovanie metoda kinologicheskoi identifikatsii zapakhov dla izuchenia krupnikh khishnikov [Use of the method of canine identification of odors for the study of large predators]. Bull. MOIP. Otd. Biol. 2001a. V. 106. N. 6. P. 3–13 (in Russian).
  • Krutova V. I. Strategii primenenia I obuchenia sobak sоbak – dеtektorov zapacha [Strategies for the use and training of dog- detectors of smell]. XXVIII Congress of the Pavlov physiological society proc. Dokl. Kazan; Moscow: GEOTAR-MED. 2001b. P. 130 (in Russian).
  • Krutova V. I., Zinkevich E. P. Vоzmozhnost raspoznovania sobakami smesei individualnikh zapachov I ikh sostavliauschikh [The ability to recognize by dogs of mixtures of individual odors and their components]. Sensornye systemy [Sensory systems]. 2014. V. 28. N. 1. P. 84–92 (in Russian).
  • Krutova V. I., Kudryavitsky E. I., Zinkevich E. P. Vremia pоiavlenia zapakha pоlоvoy prinadlezhnosty u seroi krisi [The time of appearance of the rats sex smell]. Sensornye systemy [Sensory systems]. 2014. V. 28. N. 2. P. 76–80 (in Russian).
  • Krutova V. I., Sulimov K. T., Zinkevich E. P. Vremia pоiavlenia individualnogo zapakha v ontogeneze serih kris (Rattus norvegicus) po dannim kinologicheskogo аnaliza [The time of occurrence of an individual smell in the ontogeny of Rattus norvegicus according to the data of the cynological analysis]. Sensornye systemy [Sensory systems]. 1997. V. 11. No. 3. P. 340–345 (in Russian).
  • Smirnova A.A., Lazareva O.F., Zorina Z.A. Issledovanie sposobnosty u serikh voron к elementam simvolizatsii [Investigation of the ability of hooded crows to the elements of symbolization]. Sib. Ouch. nerve. deyat. 2002. V. 52. No. 2. P. 241–254 (in Russian).
  • Adachi I., Kuwahata H., Fujita K. Dogs recall their owner’s face upon hearing the owner’s voice. Anim. Cogn. 2007. V. 10. No 1. P. 17–21.
  • Autier-Dérian D., Deputte B. L., Chalvet-Monfray K., Coulon M., Mounier L. Visual discrimination of species in dogs (Canis familiaris). Anim. Cogn. 2013. V. 16. No 4. P. 637–651.
  • Ensminger J. J. Police and Military dogs. CRC Press. Boca Raton, L., N.Y. 2012. 333 p.
  • Gadbois S., Reeve C. Canine Olfaction: Scent, Sign, and Situation. Domestic Dog Cognition and Behavior. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014. P. 3–29.
  • Gordon R. T., Schatz C. B., Myers L. J., Kosty M., Gonczy C., Kroener J., Tran M., Kurtzhals P., Heath S., Koziol JA., Arthur N., Gabriel M., Hemping J., Hemping G., Nesbitt S., Tucker-Clark L., Zaayer J. The use of canines in the detection of human cancers. J. Altern. Complement Med. 2008. V. 14. No 1. P. 61–67.
  • Jezierski T., Adamkiewicz E., Walczak M., Sobczyńska M., Górecka-Bruzda A., Ensminger J., Papet E. Efficacy of drug detection by fully-trained police dogs varies by breed, training level, type of drug and search environment. Forensic Sci. Int. 2014. V. 237. P. 112–118.
  • Jia H., Pustovyy O. M., Wang Y., Waggoner P., Beyers R. J., Schumacher J., Wildey C., Morris E., Salibi N., Denney T. S., Vodyanoy V. J., Deshpande G. Enhancement of odor-induced activity in the Canine Brain by Zinc Nanoparticles: A Functional MRI Study in Fully Unrestrained Conscious Dogs. Chem. Senses. 2016. V. 41. No 1. 53–67.
  • Liberles S. D. Mammalian pheromones. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2014. V. 76. P. 151–175.
  • Molnár C., Pongrácz P., Faragó T., Dóka A., Miklósi A. Dogs discriminate between barks: the effect of context and identity of the caller. Behav. Processes. 2009. V. 82. No 2. P. 198–201.
  • Range F., Aust U., Steurer M., Huber L. Visual categorization of natural stimuli by domestic dogs. Anim. Cogn. 2008. V. 11. No 2. P. 339–347.
  • Racca A., Amadei E., Ligout S., Guo K., Meints K., Mills D. Discrimination of human and dog faces and inversion responses in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Anim. Cogn. 2010. V. 13. No 3. P. 525–533.
  • Skalleberg A. G., Bouzga M. M. Detecting and collecting traces of semen and blood from outdoor crime scenes using crime scene dogs and presumptive tests. Forensic Sci. Int. 2016. V. 264. P. 146–152.
  • Sokolov V. E., Aleinikov P. A., Zinkevich E. P. Chemical communication in mammals: a challenge to a biologist, a semioticist, and a chemist. Acta Zool. Fennica. 1984. V. 171. P. 35–37.
  • Surov A. V., Solovieva A. V., Krutova V. I., Bodyak N. D. Olfactory signals of sex: is interspecific discrimination possible? 3rd European Congress of Mammalogy, Jyvaskyla, Finland May 29–June 3. 1999. P. 220.