• 1990 (Vol.4)
  • 1989 (Vol.3)
  • 1988 (Vol.2)
  • 1987 (Vol.1)

Quantitative study of Poggendorff illusion in school children with normal binocular vision and with strabismus

© 2018 S.I. Rychkova

Institute for Information Transmission Problems RAS 127994 GSP‑4, Moscow, B. Karetny per., 19

Received 03 Nov 2017

Quantitative study of Poggendorff illusion in comparison with regular estimation by sight has been performed in school children of different age. In our study 60 pupils with normal binocular vision and 60 pupils with strabismus were tested. We used printed test charts with different variants of the real position of the test line segment in relation to the reference line segment for quantitative estimation the range in which a subject perceives the segments as located on the same straight line. It has been established that the power of Poggendorff illusion in junior pupils with strabismus is comparable to the power of the illusion in junior pupils with normal binocular vision. Meanwhile the power of Poggendorff illusion decreases with age in pupils with normal binocular vision while reliable age-related dynamics of the power of the illusion in pupils with strabismus was not detected.

Key words: Poggendorff illusion, age dynamics, binocular vision, strabismus

DOI: 10.7868/S0235009218020038

Cite: Rychkova S. I. Kolichestvennaya otsenka illyuzii poggendorffa u shkolnikov s normalnym binokulyarnym zreniem i pri kosoglazii [Quantitative study of poggendorff illusion in school children with normal binocular vision and with strabismus]. Sensornye sistemy [Sensory systems]. 2018. V. 32(2). P. 137-144 (in Russian). doi: 10.7868/S0235009218020038

References:

  • Gregory R.L. Razumnyi glaz [Itelligent eye]. Мoscow, Editorial URSS, 2003. 240 p. (in Russian).
  • Medvedev L.N., Kocheneva K.S. Vliyanie predvaritelinoi ustanovki na vozniknovenie zritelinoi illusii Poggendorffa [The influence of pre-installation on the occurrence of the Poggendorff illusion]. Sensornye sistemy [Sensory Systems]. 2014. V. 28 (2). P. 33–38 (in Russian).
  • Ognivov V.V., Rozhkova G.I., Tokareva V.S., Bastakov V.A. Sredniaya velichina i variabelinisti illusii MulleraLyera v sravnenii c glasomerom u detei I vsroslyh [The average value and variability of the illusion Muller-Layer in comparison with regular estimation in children and adults]. Sensornye sistemy [Sensory Systems]. 2006. V. 20 (4) P. 288–299 (in Russian).
  • Rozhkova G.I., Tokareva V.S., Ognivov V.V., Bastakov V.A. Geometricheskie zritelinye illusii i mehanismy konstantnosti vospriatiya razmera u detei [Geometric visual illusions and mechanisms of constancy in the perception of size in children]. Sensornye sistemy [Sensory Systems]. 2005. V. 19 (1). P. 26–36 (in Russian).
  • Rozhkova G.I., Ognivov V.V., Ufimtsev M.V. Differencialinye porogi razlichenia dliny v usloviyah vosniknovenia geometricheskih illusii [Thresholds of differentiation of length in condition of geometrical illusions]. Materialy konferencii “Psyhofisika segodnia” posviashennaya 100-letnemy ubileu S.S. Stevensa i 35-letiu Instituta psyhologii RAN 9–10 noyabrya 2006g. [Materials of conference “Psychophysics today” dedicated to the 100th anniversary of S.S. Stevens and the 35th anniversary of the Institute of psychology RAS9–10 november 2006]. Мoscow, “Institute of psychology RAS”, 2007. P. 299–296 (in Russian).
  • Rychkova S.I. Vlianie oftalmopatologii na illusornoe vrashenie neodnoznachnyh figure u shkolnikov [Influence ophthalmopathology on illusory rotation of ambiguous figures in pupils]. Sensornye sistemy [Sensory Systems]. 2014. V. 28 (4). С. 68–74 (in Russian).
  • Rychkova S.I. Vlianie oftalmopatologii na vospriatie figur Poggendorffa i Zollenera u shkolnikov [The effect of ophthalmopathology on perception of Zollener and Poggendorff figures in schoolchildren]. Sensornye sistemy [Sensory Systems]. 2015а. V. 29 (2). P. 142–147 (in Russian).
  • Rychkova S.I. Kolichestvennaya otsenka illusii Mullera-Lyera u shkolnikov v norme i pri oftalmopatologii [Quantitative study of the Muller-Lyer illusion in schoolchildren without and with ophthalmopathology]. Sensornye sistemy [Sensory Systems]. 2015b. V. 29 (3). P. 245–250 (in Russian).
  • Tolansky S. Opticheskie illusii [Optical illusions]. Мoscow, Mir, 1967. P. 63–77 (in Russian).
  • Shoshina I.I., Medvedev L.N. Vozrastnye osobennosti pola zritelnoi asimmetrii na vospriatie figury Poggendorffa [Age characteristics gender and visual asymmetry in perception of the figure of Poggendorff]. Sensornye sistemy [Sensory Systems]. 2005. V. 19 (1). P. 37–43 (in Russian).
  • Albertazzi L., Pinna B. From grouping to visual meanings: a new theory of perceptual organization. Perception. 2008. V. 37. P. 123.
  • Changizi M.A., Widders D.M. Latency correction explains the classical geometrical illusions. Perception. 2002. V. 31. P. 1241–1262.
  • Day R. On the common stimulus condition and explanation of Muller-Lyer, Poggendorff and Zollner illusions. Austral. J. Psychol. 2010. V. 62. P. 115–120.
  • Deregowski J.B. Real space and represented space: Crosscultural perspectives. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1989. V. 12. P. 51–119.
  • Gillam B. A depth processing theory of the Poggendorff illusion. Perception & Psychophysics. 1971. V. 10. P. 211–215.
  • Gracheva M., Rychkova S., Rozhkova G. New varieties of the tests for binocular vision assessment. 41-st Meeting of the European Paediatric Ophthalmological Society, Programm and book of abstracts. St. Petersburg, 2015. P. 84.
  • Green E. The corner-Poggendorff. Perception. 1988. V. 17. P. 65–70.
  • Fischer B., da Pos O., Stürzel F. Illusory illusions: The significance of fixation on the perception of geometrical illusions. Perception. 2003. V. 32. P. 1001–1008.
  • Howe C.Q., Yang Z., Purves D. The Poggendorff illusion explained by natural scene geometry. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 2005. V. 102. P. 7707–7712.
  • Hudspeth W.J., Pribram K.H. Psychophysiological indices of cerebral maturation. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 1992. V. 12. P. 12–29.
  • Ninio J., O’Regan J.K. Characterization of the misalignment and misangulation components in the Poggendorff and corner-Poggendorff illusion. Perception. 1999. V. 28. P. 949–964.
  • Ninio J. L’empreinte des sens. Fourth edition, Paris: Odile Jacob. 2011. 280 p.
  • Ninio J. Geometrical illusions are not always where you think they are: a review of some classical and less classical illusions, and ways to describe them. Human Neuroscience. 2014. 00856.
  • Philips D. The Poggendorff illusion: premeditated or unpremeditated misbehaviour? Perception. 2006. V. 35. P. 1709–1712.
  • Ritzl A., Marshall J.C., Weiss P.H., Zafiris O., Shah N.J., Zilles K., Fink G.R. Functional anatomy and different time courses of neural processing for explicit, inferred and illusory contours. An event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2003. V. 19 (4). Р. 1567–1577.