• 1990 (Vol.4)
  • 1989 (Vol.3)
  • 1988 (Vol.2)
  • 1987 (Vol.1)

Volume 34 #1

Contents

  1. The rates of evolution of songs and speciation in grasshoppers from subfamily Gomphocerinae (Orthoptera, Acrididae, Gomphocerinae)
  2. Disruptive song – an effective mechanism to prevent copulation in stink-bugs Pentatoma rufipes
  3. The role of acoustic and vibration signals in host-parasitoid unteraction in Tachinidae (Diptera) and stink-bugs (Pentatomidae)
  4. Fine structure of receptive fields of orientation-selective ganglion cells in goldfish retina
  5. On optimal visualization of images on photoemission displays with significant dispersion of efficiency of individual elements
  6. Vanishing point detection for monocular camera extrinsic calibration under translation movement
  7. A linear regression method robust to extreme stationary clutter
  8. Filtering erroneous frame-by-frame results for planar rectangular objects localization in a video using matching transform graph
  9. Fast filtering and back projection for CT image reconstruction
  10. 1-point RANSAC for axial rotation angle estimation by tomographic projections

The role of acoustic and vibration signals in host-parasitoid unteraction in Tachinidae (Diptera) and stink-bugs (Pentatomidae)

© 2020 L. S. Shestakova,b, A. Elhashashb

aInstitute for Information Transmission Problems RAS 127051 Moscow, Bolshoy Karetny per., 19, Russia
bPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Institute of Agriculture 117198 Moscow, Mikluho-Maklaya, 6, Russia

Received 09 Oct 2019

"Flies of the family Tachinidae parasitize on in many orders of insects. When searching for a prey, they are often guided by her communication signals. It is shown that the vibration signals of Hemiptera changes in the search behavior of flies , increase they activity. Noises arising from the movement of flies on the plant did not affect the activity of bedbugs. Infected individuals of Pentatomidae retain acoustic activity but their signals can significantly change their amplitude-time structure compared to control."

Key words: Diptera, Tachinidae, mutual eavesdropping, host-parasitoid interaction

DOI: 10.31857/S0235009220010114

Cite: Shestakov L. S., Elhashash A. Rol akusticheskikh i vibratsionnykh signalov vo vzaimootnosheniyakh paraziticheskikh dvukrylykh sem. tachinidae i klopov-shchitnikov [The role of acoustic and vibration signals in host-parasitoid unteraction in tachinidae (diptera) and stink-bugs (pentatomidae)]. Sensornye sistemy [Sensory systems]. 2020. V. 34(1). P. 15-18 (in Russian). doi: 10.31857/S0235009220010114

References:

  • Barth F.G. The vibrational sense in spiders, Comparative Hearing: Insects. Еds R.R. Hoy, A.N. Popper, R.R. Fay. New York, NY: Springer Verlag, 1998. P. 228–278.
  • Cocroft R.B., Rodríguez R.L. The behavioral ecology of insect vibrational communication. 2005. V. 55. P. 323–334. DOI: 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0323:TBEOIV]2.0.CO;2
  • Castellanos I., Barbosa P. Evaluation of predation risk by a caterpillar using substrate-borne vibrations. Anim. Behav. 2006. V. 72. P. 461–469. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.02.005
  • Casas J., Magal C. Mutual eavesdropping through vibration in a host-parasitoid interaction: from plant biomechanics to behavioral ecology. Eds S.A. Drosopoulos, M.F. Claridge. Insect Sounds, Communication: Physiology, Behaviour, Ecology, Evolution. Boca Raton, FL, CRC. 2006. P. 263–274.
  • Djemai I., Casas J., Magal C. Matching host reactions to parasitoid wasp vibrations. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2001. T. 268.P. 2403–2408. DOI: 10.1098/rsbp.2001.1811
  • Fertin A., Casas J. Orientation towards prey in antlions: efficient use of wave propagation. J. Exp. Biol. 2009. T. 210. P. 3337–3343. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.004473
  • Gogala M., Virant M., Blejec A. Mocking bug Phymata crassipes (Heteroptera). Acoust. Lett. 1984. T. 8. P. 44–51.
  • Laumann R.A., Blassioli Moraes M.C., Čokl A., Borges M. Eavesdropping on sexual vibratory signals of stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) by egg parasitoid Telenomus podisi. Anim. Behav. 2007. T. 73. P. 637–649. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.09.011
  • Laumann R.A., Čokl A., Lopes A.P.S., Fereira J.B.C., Moraes M.C., Borges M. Silent singers are not safe: selective response of a parasitoid to substrate-borne vibratory signals of stink bugs. Anim. Behav. 2011. T. 82. P. 1175–1183. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.08.017
  • Meyhöfer R., Casas J. Vibrational stimuli in host location by parasitic wasps. J. Insect. Physiol. 1999. T. 45. P. 967–971. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1910(99)00060-8
  • Pfannenstiel R.S., Hunt R.E., Yeargan K.V. Orientation of a Hemipteran to vibrations produced by feeding caterpillars. J. Insect. Behav. 1995. T. 8. P. 1–9. DOI: 10.1007/BF01990965
  • Shestakov L.S. A Comparative Analysis of Vibrational Signals in 16 Sympatric Bug Species (Pentatomidae, Heteroptera). Entomological Review. 2015. V. 95. № 3. P. 310–325.
  • Sitvarin M.I., Gordon S.D., Uetz G.W., Rypstra A.L. The wolf spider Pardosa milvina detects predator threat level using only vibratory cues. Behaviour. 2016. T. 153. P.159–173. DOI: 10.1163/1568539X-00003332
  • Virant-Doberlet M., Kuhelj A., Polajnar J., Šturm R. Predator prey interactions eavesdropping in vibrational communication networks. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2019. V. 7. P. 203–208. DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00203
  • Wignall A.E., Taylor P.W. Assassin bug uses aggressive mimicry to lure spider prey. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2011. V. 278. P. 1427–1433. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2060