• 1990 (Vol.4)
  • 1989 (Vol.3)
  • 1988 (Vol.2)
  • 1987 (Vol.1)

Robust criterion for vanishing point estimation of linear trajectories of detected vehicles in a video stream

© 2019 D. A. Bocharov, K. A. Aksenov, Y. A. Shemiakina, I. A. Konovalenko

Institute for Information Transmission Problems of Russian Academy of Sciences (Kharkevich Institute) – IITP RAS, Moscow, Russia
Visillect, Moscow, Russia
Higher School of Economics (National Research University), Moscow, Russia
Smart Engines Ltd., Москва, Россия
Institute for Systems Analysis of Russian Academy of Sciences (ISA RAS), Moscow, Russia
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia

Received 17 Sep 2018

Moving objects trajectories analysis is one of the approaches for a surveillance system camera self-calibration. This paper presents the study of vanishing point detection of vehicles trajectories on an assumption of linear and parallel movement. The algorithm for trajectories vanishing point detection proposed by Tuan Hue Thi et al. is robust to trajectories-outliers, but not robust to outliers in a track. The paper presents a discussion on potential causes of outliers occurrence in a track and presents algorithm that is robust to such noise. Accuracy dependency of proposed and reference algorithms on outliers rate is estimated on the dataset of simulated trajectories. Examples of vanishing point estimation on data obtained from license plates recognition and tracking system are presented.

Key words: vanishing poin, criterion for vanishing point estimation, vanishing point estimation algorithm, moving objects trajectories, RANSAC

DOI: 10.1134/S0235009219010037

Cite: Bocharov D. A., Aksenov K. A., Shemiakina Y. A., Konovalenko I. A. Robastnyi kriterii poiska tochki skhoda proektsii pryamolineinykh traektorii dvizheniya detektirovannykh v videopotoke transportnykh sredstv [Robust criterion for vanishing point estimation of linear trajectories of detected vehicles in a video stream]. Sensornye sistemy [Sensory systems]. 2019. V. 33(1). P. 44-51 (in Russian). doi: 10.1134/S0235009219010037

References:

  • Álvarez S., Fernández D., Sotelo M. Hierarchical camera auto-calibration for traffic surveillance systems. Expert Systems with Applications. 2014. V. 41 (4). P. 1532–1542.
  • Caprile B. Torre V. Using vanishing points for camera calibration. International Journal of Computer Vision. 1990. V. 4 (2). P. 127–139.
  • Cathey F.W., Dailey D.J. A novel technique to dynamically measure vehicle speed using uncalibrated roadway cameras. IEEE Proceedings. Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. 2005. P. 777–782.
  • Cucchiara R., Piccardi M., Mello P. Image analysis and rule-based reasoning for a traffic monitoring system. Intelligent Transportation Systems. Proceedings. International Conference. IEEE. 1999. P. 758–763.
  • Dong R., Li B., Chen Q. An automatic calibration method for ptz camera in expressway monitoring system. Computer Science and Information Engineering. WRI World Congress. IEEE. 2009. V. 6. P. 636–640.
  • Du S., Ibrahim M., Shehata M., Badawy W. Automatic license plate recognition (ALPR): A state-of-the-art review. IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems for video technology. 2013. V. 23 (2). P. 311–325.
  • Dubská M., Herout A., Juránek R., Sochor J. Fully automatic roadside camera calibration for traffic surveillance. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2015. V. 16 (3). P. 1162–1171.
  • Fischler M.A. Bolles R.C. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM. 1981. V. 24 (6). P. 381–395.
  • Fung G., Yung N., Pang. G. Camera calibration from road lane markings. Optical Engineering. 2003. V 42 (10). P. 2967–2978.
  • Grigoryev A.S., Bocharov D.A., Terekhin A.P., Nikolaev D.P. Vision-based vehicle wheel detector and axle counter. Proccedings of 29th European Conference on Modelling and Simulation. New York. Curran Associates, Inc., 2015а. P. 521–526.
  • Grigoryev A.S., Khanipov T.M., Koptelov I.A., Bocharov D.A., Postnikov V.V., Nikolaev. D.P. Building a robust vehicle detection and classification module. Eighth International Conference on Machine Vision. International Society for Optics and Photonics. 2015б. V. 9875. P. 98751J.
  • Kanhere N.K., Birchfield S.T. A taxonomy and analysis of camera calibration methods for traffic monitoring applications. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2010. V. 11 (2). P. 441.
  • Konovalenko I.A., Kuznetsova E.G. Experimental comparison of methods for estimation of the observed velocity of the vehicle in video stream. Proceeding of Seventh International Conference on Machine Vision. International Society for Optics and Photonics. 2015. V. 9445. P. 94451C.
  • Ojha S., Sakhare S. Image processing techniques for object tracking in video surveillance-a survey. Pervasive Computing. International Conference. IEEE. 2015. P. 1–6.
  • Ovchinkin A.A., Ershov E.I. The algorithm of epipole position estimation under pure camera translation. Sensory systems. 2018. V. 32 (1). P. 42–49.
  • Povolotskiy M.A., Kuznetsova E.G., Khanipov T.M. Russian license plate segmentation based on dynamic time warping. Proccedings of European Conference on Modelling and Simulation. 2017. P. 285–291.
  • Song K., Tai J. Dynamic calibration of pan–tilt–zoom cameras for traffic monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics). 2006. V. 36 (5). P. 1091–1103.
  • Thi T., Lu S., Zhang J. Self-calibration of traffic surveillance camera using motion tracking. Proceedings of 11th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2008. P. 304–309.