• 1990 (Vol.4)
  • 1989 (Vol.3)
  • 1988 (Vol.2)
  • 1987 (Vol.1)

Volume 38 #4

Contents

  1. MECHANICAL STIMULATION OF THE SOLES SUPPORT ZONES AS A COUNTERMEASURE OF NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF MOTOR UNLOADING
  2. THE COCHLEAR AQUEDUCT AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE IN HEARING PATHOLOGY. LITERATURE REVIEW AND CLINICAL CASE
  3. THE EFFECT OF SENSORY-COGNITIVE TRAINING ON PERCEPTION, ATTENTION AND MEMORY IN ELDERLY PEOPLE
  4. LOCALIZATION OF A SOUND SIGNAL IN THE VERTICAL PLANE UNDER MASKING CONDITIONS
  5. THE SPATIAL HEARING DISABILITY MEASURED BY THE SPATIAL HEARING QUESTIONNAIRE IN CLINICALLY NORMAL-HEARING AND IN MILD OR MODERATE SENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS PERSONS
  6. THE REPRESENTATION OF HEART CONTRACTIONS IN SOME AUDITORY PARTS OF THE TEMPORAL CORTEX IN A NONANESTHETIZED CAT
  7. COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT ADAPTIVE COLOR CORRECTION

THE SPATIAL HEARING DISABILITY MEASURED BY THE SPATIAL HEARING QUESTIONNAIRE IN CLINICALLY NORMAL-HEARING AND IN MILD OR MODERATE SENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS PERSONS

© 2024 E. A. Klishova, L. E. Golovanova, I. G. Andreeva

ISechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry of RAS, St. Petersburg, Russia

Received 25 Jun 2024

The spatial hearing in patients with mild and moderate symmetrical chronic sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) was studied using the Russian-language version of the Spatial hearing questionnaire (SHQ). 141 patients aged 47 to 82 years were examined. The comparative analysis was performed in the groups of age-related normal hearing, mild SNHL, moderate SNHL. A significant deterioration in spatial perception was shown, revealed by the results of the survey in both groups with SNHL, and the mild and moderate hearing loss groups significantly differed in some indicators. The deterioration of spatial perception revealed by the analysis of the subscales of the questionnaire and the quantitative estimates of spatial and temporal resolution obtained earlier with mild and moderate degrees SNHL were in good agreement. With moderate SNHL, the scores of all four subscales of the questionnaire were significantly reduced. In clinical practice, this questionnaire can be used as a screening method for assessing spatial hearing in patients with SNHL.

Key words: auditory perception, spatial hearing, speech perception, age, SHQ questionnaire

DOI: 10.31857/S0235009224040059  EDN: ADBTWO

Cite: Klishova E. A., Golovanova L. E., Andreeva I. G. Sostoyanie prostranstvennogo slukha pri simmetrichnoi sensonevralnoi tugoukhosti 1-i i 2-i stepeni po dannym oprosnika shq [The spatial hearing disability measured by the spatial hearing questionnaire in clinically normal-hearing and in mild or moderate sensorineural hearing loss persons]. Sensornye sistemy [Sensory systems]. 2024. V. 38(4). P. 49–59 (in Russian). doi: 10.31857/S0235009224040059

References:

  • Altman J. A., Tavartkiladze G. А. Rukovodstvo po audiologii. [Handbook of Audiology]. М.: DMK Press, 2003. 360 p. (in Russian).
  • Babiyak V. I., Nakatis J. A. Klinicheskaya otorinolaringologiya: Rukovodstvo dlya vrachei. [Clinical Otolaryngology: A Guide for Physicians]. SPb.: Hippocrates, 2005. 800 p. (in Russian).
  • Vladimirova T. Y., Martynova A. B., Barbasheva S. S. Validaciya i perspektivy primeneniya russkoyazychnoj versii oprosnika prostranstvennogo sluha (SHQ). [Validation and prospects for the use of the Russian version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ)]. Aspirantskij vestnik Povolzh'ya. [Postgraduate bulletin of the Volga Region]. 2023. V. 23. № 1. P. 15–20. (in Russian). DOI: 10.55531/2072–2354.2023.23.1.15–20
  • Koroleva I. V. Vvedenie v audiologiyu i slukhoprotezirovanie. [Introduction to Audiology and Hearing Aid Fitting]. SPb.: KARO, 2012. 343 p. (in Russian).
  • Aggius-Vella E., Gori M., Campus C. et al. Auditory distance perception in front and rear space. Hearing Research. 2022. V. 417. Article 108468. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2022
  • Akeroyd M. A. An overview of the major phenomena of the localization of sound sources by normal-hearing, hearing-impaired, and aided listeners. Trends in Hearing. 2014. V. 18. Article 2331216514560442. DOI: 10.1177/2331216514560442
  • Akeroyd M. A., Whitmer W. M. Spatial hearing and hearing aids. Hearing Aids, eds G. R. Popelka, B. C. J. Moore, R. R. Fay, and A. N. Popper. Cham. Springer International Publishing, 2016. 181–215. DOI: 10.1007/978–3–319–33036–5_7
  • Andreeva I. G., Gvozdeva A. P., Sitdikov V. M. et al. Comparative assessment of spatial and temporal resolutions in the localization of an approaching and receding broadband noise source in healthy subjects and patients with first-degree symmetric sensorineural hearing loss. Human Physiology. 2020. V. 46. P. 465–472. DOI: 10.1134/S0362119720040039
  • Assef R. A., Almeida K., Miranda-Gonsalez E.C.D. Sensitivity and specificity of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ5) for screening hearing in adults. In CoDAS. 2022. № 34. р. e20210106. DOI: 10.1590/2317–1782/20212021106
  • Briley P. M., Summerfield A. Q. Age-related deterioration of the representation of space in human auditory cortex. Neurobiology of aging. 2014. V. 35. P. 633–644. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.08.033
  • Çildir B., Tokgöz-Yilmaz S., Sennaroğlu G. Spatial Hearing Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties of Turkish Version and Correlations with Hearing Skills. Archives Of Acoustics. 2021. V. 46. P. 249–258. DOI: 10.24425/aoa.2021.136579
  • Coudert A., Gaveau V., Gatel J. et al. Spatial Hearing Difficulties in Reaching Space in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Children Improve With Head Movements. Ear & Hearing. 2021. V. 43. P. 192–205. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001090
  • Courtois G., Grimaldi V., Lissek H., Estoppey P., Georganti E. Perception of Auditory Distance in Normal-Hearing and Moderate-to-Profound Hearing-Impaired Listeners. Trends in Hearing. 2019. V. 23. P. 1–18. DOI: 10.1177/2331216519887615
  • Davidson A., Souza P. Relationships Between Auditory Processing and Cognitive Abilities in Adults: A Systematic Review. Journ Speech Lang Hear R. 2024. V. 67. P. 296–345. DOI: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22–00716
  • Delphi M., Abdolahi F. Z., Tyler R. et al. Validity and reliability of the Persian version of spatial hearing questionnaire. Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2015. V. 29. P. 231.
  • Divenyi P. L., Stark P. B., Haupt K. M. Decline of speech understanding and auditory thresholds in the elderly. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005. V. 118. P. 89–100. DOI: 10.1121/1.1953207
  • Dobreva M. S., O'Neill W.E., Paige G. D. Influence of aging on human sound localization. Journal of neurophysiology. 2011. V. 105. P. 2471–2486. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00951.2010
  • Eddins A. C., Ozmeral E. J., Eddins D. A. How aging impacts the encoding of binaural cues and the perception of auditory space. Hearing research. 2018. № 369. P. 79–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.05.001
  • Gordon-Salant S. Hearing loss and aging: new research findings and clinical implications. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005. V. 42. P. 9–24. DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2005.01.0006
  • Freigang C., Schmiedchen K., Nitsche I., Rübsamen R. Free-field study on auditory localization and discrimination performance in older adults. Experimental brain research. 2014. № 232. P. 1157–1172. DOI: 10.1007/ s00221–014–3825–0.
  • Jung W. W., Yun J. S., Lee J. H. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire in cochlear implant users. Audiology and Speech Research. 2023. № 19. P. 261–273. DOI: 10.21848/asr.230121
  • Klishova E. A., Gvozdeva A. P., Golovanova L. E., Andreeva I. G. Temporal Characteristics of Azimuthally Moving Sound Source Localization in Patients with Mild and Moderate Sensorineural Hearing Loss. J Evol Biochem Phys. 2021. V. 57. P. 1499–1510. DOI: 10.1134/S0022093021060260
  • Kolarik A. J., Moore B. C.J., Zahorik P., Cirstea S., Pardhan S. Auditory distance perception in humans: a review of cues, development, neuronal bases, and effects of sensory loss. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2016. V. 78. P. 373–395. DOI: 10.3758/s13414–015–1015–1
  • Kong T. H., Park Y. A., Bong J. P., Park S. Y. Validation of the Korean version of the spatial hearing questionnaire for assessing the severity and symmetry of hearing impairment. Yonsei medical journal. 2017. V. 58. P. 842. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.4.842
  • Koroleva I. V., Ogorodnikova E. A. Chapter 30: Modern achievements in cochlear and brainstem auditory implantation. Neural Networks and Neurotechnologies. ds. Yu. Shelepin, E. Ogorodnikova, N. Solovyev, E. Yakimova. SPb.: Publish by VVM, 2019. P. 231–249.
  • Maneesriwongul W, Dixon J. K. Instrument translation process: a methods review. Journ Adv Nurs. 2004. V. 48. P. 175–186. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365–2648.2004.03185.x
  • Middlebrooks J. C. Sound localization. Handbook of clinical neurology. 2015. V. 129. P. 99–116. DOI: 10.1016/B978–0–444–62630–1.00006–8
  • Moulin A., Richard C. Validation of a French-language Version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire, Cluster Analysis and Comparison with the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale. Ear Hear. 2016. V. 37. P. 412–423. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000269
  • Moore B. C.J. Cochlear hearing loss: Physiological, psychological, and technical issues (2nd ed.). Wiley, 2007. 332 p.
  • Moore D. R., King A. J. Auditory perception: The near and far of sound localization. Current Biology. 1999. V. 9. P. R361-R363. DOI: 10.1016/S0960–9822(99)80227–9
  • Ogorodnikova E. A., Klishova E. A., Andreeva I. G. Experimental Approaches to the Study of Sound Source Localization by Distance in Hearing Pathology. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology. 2024. P. 1–11. DOI: 10.1007/s11055–024–01617–7.
  • Ou H., Wen B., Perreau A., Kim E., Tyler R. Validation of the Chinese Translation of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire and Its Short Form. Am J Audiol. 2016. V. 25. P. 25–33. DOI: 10.1044/2015_AJA-15–0056
  • Perreau A. E., Spejcher B., Ou H., Tyler R. The Spatial Hearing Questionnaire: Data from individuals with normal hearing. Am Journ Audiol. 2014. V. 23. P. 173–181. DOI: 10.1044/2014_AJA-13–0049
  • Potvin J., Punte A. K., Van de Heyning P. Validation of the Dutch version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire. B-ENT. 2011. V. 7. P. 235–244.
  • Sepehrnejad M., Rahimi F., Rahbar N., Nilforoush M. H., Frajadi Rad F. Standardization (translating and evaluating the validity and reliability) of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale Questionnaire-12 (SSQ12) to the Persian language. Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences & Research. 2022. V. 9. P. 84–88. DOI: 10.30476/jrsr.2022.93116.1223
  • Spence C., Lee J., Van der Stoep N. Responding to sounds from unseen locations: crossmodal attentional orienting in response to sounds presented from the rear. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2020. V. 51 P. 1137–1150. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13733.
  • Tyler R. S., Perreau A. E., Ji H. Validation of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire. Ear Hear. 2009. V. 30. P. 466–474. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a61efe
  • Tyler R. S., Pienkowski M., Roncancio E. R. et al. A review of hyperacusis and future directions: Part I. Definitions and manifestations. Am J Audiol. 2014. V. 23. P. 402. DOI: 10.1044/2014_AJA-14–0010
  • Whitmer W. M., Wright-Whyte K.F., Holman J. A., Akeroyd M. A. Hearing Aid Validation. Hearing Aids, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research 56. Eds. G. R. Popelka et al. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2016. P. 291–321.
  • Xiong Y. Z., Addleman D. A., Nguyen N. A., Nelson P. B., Legge G. E. Visual and auditory spatial localization in younger and older adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2022. V. 14. Article 838194. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.838194
  • Zhang J., Tyler R., Ji H. et al. Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ) Changes Over Time in Adults With Simultaneous Cochlear Implants. Am J Audiol. 2015. V. 24. P. 84–97. DOI: 10.1044/2015_AJA-14–0074
  • Zheng Y., Swanson J., Koehnke J., Guan J. Sound Localization of Listeners With Normal Hearing, Impaired Hearing, Hearing Aids, Bone-Anchored Hearing Instruments, and Cochlear Implants: A Review. American Journal of Audiology (AJA). 2022. V. 31. P. 819–834. DOI: 10.1044/2022_AJA-22–00006