Volume 36 #4

Contents

1. L. N. Mogilev’s contribution to the research of the spatial vision mechanisms (to the 100th anniversary of the birth)
2. Рrocessing and memorizing non-verbal non-meaning material when the exposure time is limited
3. Оtoacoustic emission testing in 21-day dry immersion as prospects for intracranial pressure monitoring
4. Modification of the method of detecting and describing keypoints SIFT for optical-to-SAR image registration

In the 60s of the last century, L.N. Mogilev at the Irkutsk State University launched a multifaceted large-scale work on the study of the spatial vision mechanisms which corresponded to the latest achievements and trends of the then science of vision both in terms of the methodological level and the choice of theoretical and experimental problems .Unfortunately, this work was carried out largely in isolation and was poorly presented at international conferences. As a result, many important findings of these studies and even L.N. Mogilev’s monograph “Mechanisms of Spatial Vision” (1982) remained unknown to most members of the scientific community involved in the development of methods for studying and theories of visual spatial perception, and were not included even in sufficiently detailed and complete foreign review editions. Perhaps this is also due to the fact that L.N. Mogilev himself in his publications paid insufficient attention to the work of his foreign predecessors and colleagues who carried out similar studies simultaneously with him. In connection with the anniversary date – the 100th anniversary of the birth of L.N. Mogilev – it seems important and useful to recall the most interesting works of this remarkable scientist and analyze them in context with similar earlier and parallel studies. In this article, an attempt is made to discuss the works of L.N. Mogilev in the field of spatial vision, highlighting the areas of research that most closely intersect with the studies and works of foreign authors who have received wide popularity and recognition.

Key words: L.N. Mogilev, mechanisms of spatial vision, stereokinetic effect, autostereogram, binarimeter

DOI: 10.31857/S0235009222040047

References:

• Bachaldina L.N., Gutnik I.N., Korolenko A.V., Malyshev V.V., Rozanova O.I., Rychkova S.I., Solov’eva V.V., Shchuko A.G. Teoreticheskaya i klinicheskaya binarimetriya [Theoretical and clinical binarimetry]. Novosibirsk. 2006. 184 p.
• Vasil’eva N.N., Rozhkova G.I. Vozrastnye izmeneniya vzaimodeistviya monokulyarnykh i binokulyarnykh mekhanizmov prostranstvennogo vospriyatiya [Age dynamics of interaction between monocular and binocular mechanisms of spatial perception]. Sensornye sistemy [Sensory systems]. 2010. V. 24 (1). P. 18–26.
• Kompaneiskii B.N. Glubinnye oshchushcheniya. Analiz teorii razdrazheniya ne vpolne sootvetstvuyushchikh tochek [Depth perception. Analysis of the theory of excitation of not quite corresponding points.]. Vestnik oftalmologii [The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology]. 1939. V. 14 (1). P. 90–105. (in Russian).
• Mogilev L.N. O prostranstvennom zritel’nom effeke pri povtorjajuschemsja izobrazhenii [On the spatial visual effect with a repeated image]. Sbornik dokladov vtoroi nauchnoi konferentsii fiziologov, biokhimikov i farmakologov Zapadno-Sibirskogo ob"edineniya, posvyashchennoi XXII s"ezdu KPSS. Tomsk. 1961. P. 95–96. (in Russian).
• Mogilev L.N. Rezervy nashego zreniya [Reserves of our vision]. Angara. 1963. V. 2 (59). P. 40–41. (in Russian).
• Mogilev L.N. Stereokineticheskii ehffekt kak odin iz pokazatelei funktsional’noi organizatsii zritel’nykh tsentrov [Stereokinetic effect as one of the indicators of the functional organization of visual centers.]. Funktsional’no-strukturnye osnovy sistemnoi deyatel’nosti i mekhanizmy plastichnosti mozga. Sbornik trudov Instituta mozga AMN SSSR. Moskva. 1975. V. IV. P. 76–79. (in Russian).
• Mogilev L.N. Sposob issledovaniya prostranstvennogo zreniya [A method for studying spatial vision]. Сertificate of authorship № 528929. Ofitsial’nyi byulleten' Gosudarstvennogo komiteta Soveta Ministrov SSSR po delam izobretenii i otkrytii. Otkrytiya, izobreteniya, promyshlennye obraztsy, tovarnye znaki. 1976. V. 35. P. 11. (in Russian).
• Mogilev L.N. Binarimetr. [Binarimeter]. Avtorskoe svidetel’stvo No 596220. Ofitsial’nyi bulleten’. 1978a. No 8. (in Russian).
• Mogilev L.N. O differentsirovannom issledovanii silovykh vzaimootnoshenii mekhanizmov prostranstvennogo zreniya [On a differentiated study of the power relationships of the mechanisms of spatial vision]. Sistemnye i kletochnye mekhanizmy regulyatsii fiziologicheskikh funktsii. Mezhvuzovskii sbornik. Irkutsk. 1978b. P. 4–9. (in Russian).
• Mogilev L.N. Prostranstvennye zritel’nye ehffekty kak pokazateli funktsional’noi organizatsii zritel’nykh tsentrov [Spatial visual effects as indicators of the functional organization of visual centers]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Moscow. 1979. 49 p. (in Russian).
• Mogilev L.N. Mekhanizmy prostranstvennogo zreniya [Mechanisms of spatial vision]. L.: Nauka. 1982. 112 p. (in Russian).
• Mogilev L.N., Boyarkina L.V. Ispol’zovanie uslovno-reflektornykh pokazatelei dlya kharakteristiki stereokineticheskogo ehffekta u lyudei [The use of reflexive indicators to characterize the stereokinetic effect in humans]. Sistemnye i kletochnye mekhanizmy regulyatsii fiziologicheskikh funktsii. Mezhvuzovskii sbornik. Irkutsk. 1978. P. 10–14. (in Russian).
• Mogilev L.N., Rychkov I.L. K voprosu ob ehvolyutsii prostranstvennogo zreniya [On the question of the evolution of spatial vision]. Funktsional’no-strukturnye osnovy sistemnoi deyatel’nosti i mekhanizmy plastichnosti mozga. Sbornik trudov Instituta mozga AMN SSSR. Moskva, 1974. V. III. P. 466–470. (in Russian).
• Mogilev L.N., Rychkov I.L. Ustroistvo dlya opredeleniya prostranstvennykh zritel’nykh ehffektov [A device for determining spatial visual effects]. Сertificate of authorship № 4523317. 1974. № 45. P. 13. (in Russian).
• Mogilev L.N., Rychkov I.L., Boyarkina L.V. O vzaimootnosheniyakh binokulyarnogo i stereo-kineticheskogo mekhanizmov prostranstvennogo zreniya [On the relationship between binocular and stereo-kinetic mechanisms of spatial vision]. Tezisy nauchnykh soobshchenii XII S"ezda fiziologov. Tbilisi. 1975. P. 73–74. (in Russian).
• Mogilev L.N., Ufimtseva L.P. K voprosu o sravnitel’nofiziologicheskom issledovanii mekhanizmov prostranstvennogo zreniya [To the question of the comparative physiological study of the mechanisms of spatial vision]. Sistemnye i kletochnye mekhanizmy regulyatsii fiziologicheskikh funktsii. Mezhvuzovskii sbornik. Irkutsk. 1978. P. 20–24. (in Russian).
• Mogilev L.N., Yunin V.N., Rychkov I.L., Prostranstvennyi ehffekt, poluchennyi ot risovannykh ploskikh podvizhnykh izobrazhenii bez ispol’zovaniya stereopary [A spatial effect obtained from hand-drawn flat moving images without the use of a stereopair]. Tezisy dokladov V Vsesoyuznoi konferentsii po neirokibernetike. Rostovna-Donu. 1973. P. 208. (in Russian).
• Rozhkova G.I. Avtostereogrammy: osobennosti struktury, usloviya uspeshnogo vospriyatiya i prakticheskoe ispol’zovanie [Autostereograms: structural features, conditions of successful perception and practical usage]. Stereozrenie cheloveka i stereotekhnologii. Metodicheskoe posobie. Ed. G.I. Rozhkova. M.: OOO “KUNA”. 2022a. P. 130–137. (in Russian).
• Nikolayev P.P. Modeli konstantnogo zritel’nogo vospriyatiya. Intellektual’nye protsessy i ih modelirovanije. [Models of constant visual perception.] M., Nauka, 1987. P. 300–350. (in Russian).
• Rozhkova G.I. Avtostereogrammy: osobennosti struktury, usloviya uspeshnogo vospriyatiya i prakticheskoe ispol’zovanie [Autostereograms: structural features, conditions of successful perception and practical usage]. Stereozrenie cheloveka i stereotekhnologii. Metodicheskoe posobie. Ed. G.I. Rozhkova. M.: OOO “KUNA”. 2022a. P. 130–137. (in Russian).
• Rozhkova G.I. Sluchaino-tochechnye stereogrammy: unikal’nye instrumenty dlya izucheniya, otsenki i trenirovki binokulyarnykh mekhanizmov vospriyatiya glubiny [Random-dot stereograms: the unique tools for studying, testing, and training brain mechanisms of binocular depth perception]. Stereozrenie cheloveka i stereotekhnologii. Metodicheskoe posobie. Ed. G.I. Rozhkova. M.: OOO “KUNA”. 2022б. P. 123–129. (in Russian).
• Rozhkova G.I., Vasil’eva N.N. Vzaimodeistvie binokulyarnogo i stereokineticheskogo mekhanizmov vospriyatiya glubiny u detei s normal’nym i narushennym binokulyarnym zreniem [Interaction of binocular and stereokinetic depth mescanisms in children with normal and impaired binocular vision]. Sensornye sistemy [Sensory systems]. 2001. V. 15 (1). P. 61–68. (in Russian).
• Rychkov I.L. O vzaimootnoshenii binokulyarnogo i stereokineticheskogo mekhanizmov pro-stranstvennogo zreniya [On the relationship between binocular and stereokinetic mechanisms of spatial vision]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Irkutsk. 1974. 23 p. (in Russian).
• Rychkov I. L. Mnogourovnevaya funktsional’naya organizatsiya prostranstvennogo zreniya v rezul’tativnoi deyatel’nosti zhivotnykh i cheloveka [Multilevel functional organization of spatial vision in the productive activity of animals and humans]. Diss. dokt. biol. nauk. Irkutsk. 1985. 383 p. (in Russian).
• Aschenbrenner C.M. Problems in getting information into and out of air photographs. Photogram Engin. 1954. V. 20. P. 398–401.
• Bergua A., Skrandies W. An early antecedent to modern random dot stereograms – ’the secret stereoscopic writing’ of Ramon y Cajal. Int J Psychophysiol. 2000. V. 36. P. 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(99)00111-7
• Brewster D. On the knowledge of distance given by binocular vision. Trans Roy Soc Edinb. 1844a. V. 15. P. 663–674.
• Brewster D. On the law of visible position in single and binocular vision and on the representation of solid figures by the union of dissimilar plane pictures on the retina. Trans Roy Soc Edinb. 1844b. V. 15. P. 349–368.
• Fisher G.T. Factors affecting estimation of depth with variations of stereokinetic effect. Amer. J. Physiol. 1956. V. 69. P. 252–257.
• Goethe J.W. Zur Farbenlehre. Tubingen. English translation in Matthaei R 1971 Goethe’s color theory. 1810. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
• Howard I.P. Perceiving in depth. Volume 1. Basic mechanisms. Oxford university press, 2012a. 664 p.
• Howard I.P., Rogers B.J. Perceiving in depth. Volume 2: Stereoscopic vision. Oxford university press. 2012. 635 p.
• Howard I.P. Perceiving in depth. Volume 3. Other mechanisms of depth perception. Oxford university press, 2012b. 392 p.
• Julesz B. Binocular depth perception of computer-generated patterns. Bell Syst Techn J. 1960. V. 39 (5). P. 1125–1162. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1960.tb03954.x
• Julesz B. Binocular depth perception without familiarity cues. Science. 1964. V.145. P. 356–362. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.145.3630.356
• Julesz B. Foundations of cyclopean perception. Chicago: Oxford Univ. Chicago Press, 1971. 406 p.
• Kramer P., Stefano V., Bressan P. Stereokinetic effect, kinetic depth effect, and structure from motion. The Oxford handbook of perceptual organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199686858.013.053
• Locke J. On single and double vision produced by viewing objects with both eyes: and on an optical illusion with regard to the distance of objects. Am J Sci Arts. 1849. V. 7. P. 68–74.
• Logvinenko A.D., Belopolskii V.I. Convergence as a cue for distance. Perception. 1994. V. 23 (2). P. 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1068/p230207
• Logvinenko A.D., Epelboim J., Steinman R.M. The role of vergence in the perception of distance: a fair test of Bishop Berkeley’s claim. Spatial Vision. 2001. V. 15 (1). P. 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568568015269202
• Marr D.A. Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. N.Y., W.H. Freeman & Company.1982. 415 p.
• Meyer H. Uber die Schatzung der Grosse und Entfernung. Poggendorf’s Ann Physik Chem. 1852. V. 25. P. 198–207.
• Mefferd R.B., Wieland B.A. Perception of depth in rotating objects: Perspective as a determinant of a stereogenesis. Percept. and Motor Skills. 1967. V. 25. P. 621–628.
• Mogylev L.N., Rytchkov I.L., Rizzolatti G. Alcune osservazione sui fenomeni stereocinetici. Boll. Soc. It. Biol. Sper. 1978. V. LIV. P. 1763–1768.
• Musatti C.L. Sui fenomeni stereokinetici. Archivio Italiano di Psicologia. 1924. V. 3. P. 105–120.
• Musatti C.L. Forma e assimilazione [Shape and assimilation]. Archivio Italiano di Psicologia. 1931. V. 9. P. 61–156.
• Ono H., Mitson L., Seabrook K. Change in convergence and retinal disparities as an explanation for the wallpaper phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1971. V. 91 (1). P. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031795
• Peck D. Stereoscopic patterns and method of making same. 1979. US Patent 4135502.
• Proffit D., Rock I., Hecht H., Schubert J. Stereokinetic effect and its relation to the kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology.1992. V. 18 (1). P. 3–21. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0096-1523.18.1.3
• Ramon y Cajal S. Recreaciones estereoscopicas y binoculares. La Fotografia. 1901. V. 27. P. 41–48.
• Sawada T., Rozhkova G.I. Two rediscoveries of the autostereogram in the 1960s. i-Perception. 2020. V. 11 (1). P. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669520908895
• Smith R. A complete system of optiks in four books. 1738. Cambridge.
• Trent E. Stereo designs as an art form. Bulletin of the Stereoscopic Society. 1972. V. 37. P. 7–10.
• Tyler C. Autostereogram. Scholarpedia, 2014. 9 (4):9229. https://doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.9229
• Tyler C.W., Clarke M.B. Autostereogram. Stereoscopic Displays and Applications. Proc. SPIE. 1990. V. 1258. P. 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.19904
• Wallach H., Centrella N.M. Identity imposition and its role in a stereokinetic effect. Perception and Psychophysics. 1990. V. 48 (6). P. 535–542. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211599
• Ullman S. The Interpretation of Visual Motion. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1979. 229 p.