• 1987 (Vol.1)

Threshold loudness’ changes for the first and last pulse in sequence in listeners with normal hearing and hearing losуs

© 2020 L. K. Rimskaya-Korsakova, D. I. Nechaev

JSC Andreyev Acoustics Institute 117036 Moscow, Shvernika St. 4, Russia
Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution 119071 Moscow, Leninsky Prospect. 33, Russia

Received 10 Sep 2019

The test pulses were the first or last in the pulse sequence with repetition period of T. The dependences of the detection threshold of test pulses loudness on the period T were obtained. The goal was to study the properties of temporal resolution and changes of test pulses loudness. Test pulse and 11 masking pulses have a center frequency of 4 kHz and a frequency band of 240 Hz. The level of masking pulses was 80 dB SPL. The period T varied in the range of 20–150 ms. Temporal resolution of the test pulse loudness corresponded to the minimum period, a Tmin threshold, at which the listener could hear the test pulse. The pulse loudness changes, a dIso shifts, were estimated as the difference between the detection thresholds of the test pulses presented in the pulse sequence with period Tmin and in silence. The Tmin threshold and the dIso shifts were compared with the auditory sensitivity of the listeners, as well as with the temporal summation of tones and pulse sequences. Five listeners with normal hearing ~20 dB were included in first group and two listeners with highfrequency hearing loss of ~40 dB – in second group. For listeners of two groups, temporal resolution and loudness changes of the test pulses correlated with auditory sensitivity, but for listeners of the first group, the same properties correlated with temporal summation of the pulse sequences. For the listeners of the first group, the Tmin threshold was of 25 ms when temporal summation of the pulse sequences were equal to ~2 dB, but increased up to 50–80 ms when the temporal summation increased up to ~6 dB. At the same time the dIso shift reached 14–28 dB for the last test pulse, and 10–23 dB for the first test pulse. For the listeners of the second group, the Tmin thresholds were high, ~80–150 ms, and the dIso shifts were low, ~0–9 dB. The Tmin threshold and the dIso shift could characterize the auditory temporary processing of periodic sounds in the listeners.

Key words: loudness, impulse, periodic sequence, masking, summation

DOI: 10.31857/S0235009220020092

Cite: Rimskaya-Korsakova L. K., Nechaev D. I. Izmeneniya porogovoi gromkosti pervogo ili poslednego impulsa posledovatelnosti u slushatelei s normalnym slukhom i slukhovymi poteryami [Threshold loudness’ changes for the first and last pulse in sequence in listeners with normal hearing and hearing losуs]. Sensornye sistemy [Sensory systems]. 2020. V. 34(2). P. 117–130 (in Russian). doi: 10.31857/S0235009220020092


  • Rimskaya-Korsakova L.K. Slukhovaya perifericheskaya adaptatsiya k korotkim stimulam v slukhovom oblegchenii raspoznavaniya intensivnosti v shume [Auditory peripheral adaptation to short stimuli in auditory facilitation of recognition of intensity in noise]. Sensornye sistemy [Sensory systems]. 2007. V. 21 (3). P. 286–298 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.7868/S032079191704013X.
  • Rimskaya-Korsakova L.K. Perifericheskoye kodirovaniye i slukhovoye raspoznavaniye izmeneniy urovney korotkikh vysokochastotnykh stimulov, predyavlyayemykh posle maskerov [Peripheral coding and auditory recognition of changes in levels of short high-frequency stimuli presented after maskers] Sensornye sistemy [Sensory systems]. 2011. V. 25 (4). P. 305–318 (in Russian).
  • Arieh Y., Kelly K., Marks L.E. Tracking the time to recovery after induced loudness reduction (L). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2005. V. 117. № 6. P. 3381–3384. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2202867
  • Bacon S.P., Gleitman R.M. Modulation detection in subjects with relatively flat hearing losses. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1992. V. 35. № 3. P. 642–653. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3503.642
  • Bacon S.P., Viemeister N.F. Temporal modulation transfer functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Audiology. 1985. V. 24. № 1. P. 117–134. https://doi.org/10.3109/00206098509081545
  • Carlyon R.P., Buus S., Florentine M. Temporal integration of trains of tone pulses by normal and by cochlearly impaired listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1990. V. 8. № 1. P. 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.399293
  • Fastl H., Zwicker E. Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models. 2007. Springer. 480 p.
  • Fastl H. Temporal partial masking of pure tones by broadband noise: Experimental result and models. Acta Acustica united with Acustica. 1984. V. 54. № 1. P. 145–153.
  • Fitzgibbons P.J., Gordon-Salant S. Age-related differences in discrimination of temporal intervals in accented tone sequences. Hearing Research. 2010. V. 264. № 1–2. P. 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2009.11.008
  • Fitzgibbons P.J., Gordon-Salant S. Age effects in discrimination of repeating sequence intervals. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2011. V. 129. № 3. P. 1490–1500. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3533728
  • Florentine M., Fastl H., Buus S. Temporal integration in normal hearing. cochlear impairment. and impairment simulated by masking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1988. V. 84. № 1. P. 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.396964
  • Formby C. Modulation threshold functions for chronically impaired Meniere patients. Audiology. 1987. V. 26. № 1. P. 89–102.
  • Garner W.R., Miller G.A. The masked thresholds of pure tones as a function of duration. J. Exp. Psychol. 1947. V. 37. № 1. P. 293–303.
  • Garner W.R. Auditory thresholds of short tones as a function of repetition rates. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1947. V. 19. № 3. P. 600–608. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1916527
  • Green D.M., Birdsall T.G., Tanner W.P. Signal detection as a function of signal intensity and duration. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1957. V. 29. № 1. P. 523–531. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908951
  • Gelfand S.A. Hearing: An Introduction to Psychological and Physiological Acoustics. Informa. Healthcare UK. 2010. 311 p.
  • Elliott L.L. Temporal and masking phenomena in persons with sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology. 1975. V. 14. № 1. P. 336–353. https://doi.org/10.3109/00206097509071748
  • Epstein M. An introduction to induced loudness reduction. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2007. V. 122. № 3. EL74-80. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2761922
  • Mapes-Riordan D., Yost W.A. Loudness recalibration as a function of level. J. Acoust. Soc Am. 1999. V. 106. № 6. P. 3506. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428203
  • McFadden S.L., Quaranta N., Henderson D. Suprathreshold measures of auditory function in the aging chinchilla. Hearing Resesrch. 1997. V. 111. № 1–2. P. 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-5955(97)00100-7
  • Miller J., Aibel I.L., Green K. On the nature of rate-dependent processing during phonetic perception. Perception and Psychophysics. 1984. V. 35. № 1. P. 5–15.
  • Mills D.M., Schmiedt R.A. Metabolic presbycusis: differential changes in auditory brainstem and otoacoustic emission responses with chronic furosemide application in the gerbil. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2004. V. 5. № 1. P. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-003-4004-3
  • Moore B.C.J. An introduction to the psychology of hearing. Academic Press. 1997. 413 p.
  • Moore B.C.J., Shailer M.J., Schooneveldt G.P. Temporal modulation transfer functions for band-limited noise in subjects with cochlear hearing loss. British Journal of Audiology. 1992. V. 26. № 1. P. 229–237.
  • Nieder B., Buus S., Florentine M., Scharf B. Interactions between test- and inducer-tone durations in induced lo udness reduction. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2003. V. 114. № 5. P. 2846–2855. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1616580
  • Plomp R., Bouman M.A. Relation between hearing threshold and duration for tone pulses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1959. V. 31. № 1. P. 749–758.
  • Richards A.M. Loudness perception for short-duration tones in masking noise. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1977. V. 20. № 1. P. 684–693.
  • Scharf B. Partial masking. Acustica. 1964. V. 1. № 1. P. 16–23.
  • Schmiedt R.A., Lang H., Okamura H.-O., Schulte B.A. Effects of furosemide chronically applied to the round window: a model of metabolic presbyacusis. J. Neurosci. 2002. V. 22. № 21. P. 9643–9650.
  • Viemeister N.F. Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1979. V. 66. № 5. P. 1364–1380. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.383531
  • Wagner E., Scharf B. Induced loudness reduction as a function of exposure time and signal frequency. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2006. V. 119. № 2. P. 1012–1020. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2159430
  • Wingfield A., Poon L.W., Lombardi L.L., Lowe D. Speed of processing in normal aging: effects of speech rate. linguistic structure. and processing time. J. Gerontol. 1985. V. 40. № 5. P. 579–585. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/40.5.579
  • Zwislocki J.J. Theory of temporal auditory summation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1960. V. 32. № 1. P. 1046–1060. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908276
  • Zwislocki J.J. Temporal summation of loudness: An analysis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1969. V. 46. № 2. P. 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1911708