• 2021 (Vol.35)

Visual acuity of ophthalmologically healthy people and features of form the foveal pit of the retina

© 2018 R. A. Mukhamadeev, E. M. Gareev, D. I. Koshelev

FSBI “The Russian Eye and Plastic Surgery Centre” of the Russian Federation Health Ministry, 450075 Bashkortostan republic, Ufa-city, Zorge str., 67/1, Russia

Received 05 Jun 2018

In forty ophthalmologically healthy volunteers (80 eyes) 19–28 years according to the optical coherence tomography (OCT), the description of the retinal thickness profile in the foveal pit of the retina (FP) was carried out by five points from its edge to the center along the vertical and horizontal meridian. Cluster analysis of these 80 profiles allowed to divide them into three typological groups, which differ in the thickness of the retina at each point of measurement. The typological groups of FP profiles differed by the average level of visual acuity (VA) – the significantly highest monocular VA occurred in optimal FP profiles, which generally have the greatest thickness and degree of its “deflection” from the edge to the center. All other factors – optical characteristics, laterality (right/left) and gender differences did not have a significant impact on the level of VA.

Key words: the profile thickness of the foveal pit, visual acuity

DOI: 10.1134/S0235009218040078

Cite: Mukhamadeev R. A., Gareev E. M., Koshelev D. I. Ostrota zreniya oftalmologicheski zdorovykh lyudei i osobennosti formy tsentralnoi yamki setchatki [Visual acuity of ophthalmologically healthy people and features of form the foveal pit of the retina]. Sensornye sistemy [Sensory systems]. 2018. V. 32(4). P. 294-301 (in Russian). doi: 10.1134/S0235009218040078


  • Bondarko V.M., Danilova M.V., Krasil’nikov N.N., Leushina L.I., Nevskaya A.A., Shelepin Yu.E. Prostranstvennoe zrenie [Spatial vision]. Sankt-Peterburg. Nauka, 1999. 218 p. (in Russian).
  • Volkov V.V., Gorban’ A.I., Dzhaliashvili O.A. Klinicheskaya vizo- i refraktometriya [Clinical viso- and refractometry]. Leningrad. Medicina, 1976. 216 p. (in Russian).
  • Gareev E.M., Muhamadeev R.A., Koshelev D.I. Zavisimost’ ostroty zreniya oftal’mologicheski zdorovyh lyudej ot tolshchiny makulyarnoj oblasti setchatki [Dependence of visual acuity of ophthalmologically healthy people on the thickness of the macular region of the retina]. Sensornye sistemy [Sensory systems]. 2017. V. 31(4). P. 305–310 (in Russian).
  • Koshelev D.I. Dvizheniya pravogo i levogo glaza vo vremya fiksacii pri ehmmetropii i miopii [Movement of the right and left eye during fixation in emmetropia and myopia]. Vestnik OGU. 2012. (12). P. 101–105 (in Russian).
  • Muhamadeev R.A., Koshelev D.I., Sirotkina I.V. Ostrota zreniya i fiksacionnye harakteristiki zritel’noj sistemy u shkol’nikov mladshih klassov [Visual acuity and fixation characteristics of the visual system in Junior schoolchildren]. Funkcional’noe sostoyanie i zdorov’e cheloveka: Materialy II Vseross. nauch.-prakt. konf. [Functional status, and health. In : proceedings of the II all-Russian. scientific.-prakt. Conf.] Rostov-na-Donu, 2008. P. 138–140 (in Russian).
  • Oldenderfer M.S., Blehshfild R.K. Klasternyj analiz [Cluster Analysis]. Faktornyj, klasternyj i diskriminantnyj analiz [Factor, Cluster and Discriminant Analysis]. Moscow. Finansy i statistika. 1989. P. 139–210 (in Russian).
  • Rebrova O.Yu. Statisticheskij analiz medicinskih dannyh. Primenenie paketa prikladnyh programm STATISTICA [Statistical analysis of medical data. The use of the Statistica software package]. Moscow. MediaSpfera, 2002. 312 p. (in Russian).
  • Rozhkova G.I., Matveev S.G. Zrenie detej: problemy ocenki i funkcional’noj korrekcii [Children’s vision: problems of evaluation and functional correction]. Moscow. Nauka, 2007. 315 p. (in Russian).
  • Halfin A.A. STATISTICA 6. Statisticheskij analiz dannyh [STATISTICA 6. Statistical analysis of data]. Мoscow. Binom-Press, 2008. 512 p. (in Russian).
  • Chamberlain M.D., Guymer R.H., Dirani M., Hopper J.L., Baird P.N. Heritability of macular thickness determined by optical coherence tomography. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006. V. 47. P. 336–340. DOI: org/10.1167/iovs.05-0599.
  • Hendrickson A., Possin D., Vajzovic L., Toth C.A. Histological development of the human fovea from midgestation to maturity. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2012. V. 154 (5). P. 767–778. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.05.007.
  • Lee H., Purohit R., Patel A., Papageorgiou E., Sheth V., Maconachie G., Pilat A., McLean R.J., Proudlock F.A., Gottlob I. In vivo foveal development using optical coherence tomography. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015. V. 56. P. 4537–4545. DOI: org/10.1167/iovs.15-16542.
  • Scheibe P., Zocher M.T., Francke M., Rauscher F.G. Analysis of foveal characteristics and their asymmetries in the normal population. Exp. Eye Res. 2016. V. 148. P. 1–11. DOI: org/10.1016/j.exer.2016.05.013.
  • Song W.K., Lee S.C., Lee E.S., Kim C.Y., Kim S.S. Macular thickness variations with sex, age, and axial length in healthy subjects: a spectral domain-optical coherence tomography study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010. V. 51. P. 3913–3918. DOI: org/10.1167/iovs.09-4189.