• 1987 (Vol.1)

Visual acuity dependence on refraction: diversity ambiguity of impact

© 2016 E.M. Gareev, R.A. Mukhamadeev, D.I. Koshelev

FSBI “The Russian Eye and Plastic Surgery Centre” of the Russian Federation Health Ministry 450075, Bashkortostan republic, Ufa-city, Zorge str., 67/1

Received 02 Jun 2015

A relationship between visual acuity (VA) and condition of the eye optic system was investigated. The results of uncorrected VA measurements as well as spherical and cylindric refraction components were selected in people with the age ranging from 11 to 60 in whom VA reduction could be caused specifically by refraction anomalies – in all 571 cases (eyes). In addition the same measurements were used in 56 ophthalmically healthy people (112 eyes). It was shown that in the space of theoretically permissible combinations of spherical and cylindric components there are areas of their most likely, unlikely and practically not possible combinations. In different regions of this space VA depenedence upon the combinations of spherical and cylindric refraction components is exhibited in a certain specific way and, on the whole, it may be described as a surface of a very complicated shape. When distinguishing only a spherical component or only a cylindric one this dependence is most adequately described by nonlinear functions. The degree and sign of the linear VA correlation with these refraction components change on different axis segments of their variation and especially they radically change with a spherical refraction component.

Key words: visual acuity, refraction, myopia, hypermetropia, astigmatism

Cite: Gareev E. M., Mukhamadeev R. A., Koshelev D. I. Zavisimost ostroty zreniya ot refraktsii: raznoobrazie i neodnoznachnost vliyaniya [Visual acuity dependence on refraction: diversity ambiguity of impact]. Sensornye sistemy [Sensory systems]. 2016. V. 30(1). P. 17-28 (in Russian).

References:

  • Avetisov V.E. The dependence of visual acuity myopic eyes from defocus image under different conditions of optical correction // Vestnik oftalmologii. 1975. (6). P. 56–60 [in Russian].
  • Avetisov E.S. Myopia. M.: Medicine, 1999. 288 p. [in Russian].
  • AnaninV.F. Accommodation and myopia. M.: Publishing house RUDN and Biomedform, 1992. 136 p. [in Russian].
  • Bates G.U. Perfect vision without glasses. M.: Air transport, 1990. 152 p. [in Russian].
  • Bondarko V.M., Danilova M.V., Krasilnikov N.N. Spatial vision. SPb. Science, 1999. 218 p. [in Russian].
  • Borovikov V.P. Statistica. The art of data analysis on the computer. SPb.: Piter, 2003. 688 p. [in Russian].
  • Volkov V.V. Psychophysiology of visual process and methods of its study // Clinical physiology of vision. M.: RUSSOMED, 1993. P. 158–179 [in Russian].
  • Volkov V.V., Gorban A.I., Jaliashvili O.A. Clinical viso- and refractometry. L.: Medicine, 1976. 216 p. [in Russian].
  • Gareev E.M. To the problem of factors that determine the most important visual function. Part I. A Mixed sample of “Good vision” – “Poor vision” // Sensory systems. 2004a. T. 18. (4). P. 286–295 [in Russian].
  • Gareev E.M. To the problem of factors that determine the most important visual function. Part II. The specificity of the functionally important subgroups // Sensory systems. 2004b. T. 19. (1). P. 14– 25 [in Russian].
  • Kogan A.I. The role of compensation in the development and operation of a sensory-motor apparatus of the binocular visual system // Problems of physiological optics. 1967. V. 14. P. 61–76 [in Russian].
  • Proskurina O.V., Golubev S.Yu., Markova E.Yu. The study of accommodation, age norms. Subjective methods // The accommodation: a Guide for physicians / Ed. L.A. Katargina. M.: April, 2012. P. 40–49 [in Russian].
  • Rebrova O.Yu. Statistical analysis of medical data. The use of the Statistica software package. M.: MediaSfera, 2002. 312 p. [in Russian].
  • Rozhkova G.I. Types of dependence of visual acuity on the distance of observation and assessment of refractive errors // Ophthalmology at the turn of the century. SPb.: Military medical Academy, 2001. [in Russian].
  • Rozhkova G.I., Tokareva V.S., Vashchenko V.I., Gromova E.I., Senkina E.V. Age dynamics of visual acuity in schoolchildren. Binocular visual acuity for different distances // Sensory systems. 2001. T. 15. ( 3). P. 257–263 [in Russian].
  • Rosenblum Yu.Z. Refraction, accommodation and vision // Clinical physiology of vision. M.: RUSSOMED, 1993. P. 180–195 [in Russian].
  • Rosenblum Yu.Z. Optometry. SPb.: Hippocrates, 1996. 320 p. [in Russian].
  • Sergienko N.M. Clinical refraction of the human eye. Kiev: Health, 1975. 63 p. [in Russian].
  • Sergienko N.M. Ophthalmic optics. Kiev, 2015. 264 p. [in Russian].
  • Smirnov M.S. Optics of the eye // Physiology of sensory systems. Part I. Physiology of vision. L.: Science, 1971. P. 37–59 [in Russian].
  • Atchison D.A., Mathur A. Visual acuity with astigmatic blur // Optom. Vis. Sci. 2011. V. 88. (7). P. 788–805.
  • Brown N.P., Koretz J.F., Bron A.J. The development and maintenance of emmetropia // Eye. 1999. V. 13. (1). P. 83–92.
  • Campbell F.W. The depth of the field of the human eye // Optica Acta. 1957. V. 4. P. 157–164.
  • Campbell F.W., Gubisch R.W. Optical quality of the human eye // J. Physiol. 1966. (186). P. 558–578.
  • CurtinBr.J. The myopias: basic science and clinical management. Philadelphia: Harper Row. 1985. 495 p.
  • Crawford I.S., Shagas C., Pashby T.J. Refraction between visual acuity and refractive error in myopia // Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1945. V. 28. P. 1220–1225.
  • Curcio C.A., Allen K.A. Topography of ganglion cells in human retina // J. Comp. Neurol. 1990. V. 300. (1). P. 5–25.
  • Evsutin A.A., Rozhkova G.I. Human visual acuity as a function of viewing distance in young and old adults // Abstr. 6th Internat. Congr. Neuroethol. Bonn. 2001. P. 90.
  • Gao H., Hollyfield J.G. Aging of the human retina. Differential loss of neurons and retinal pigment epithelial cells // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1992. V. 33. (1). P. 1–17.
  • Gupta Y., Rizvi S.A.R., Gupta M. Physiological disproportions between un-corrected vision and degree of myopia // Nep. J. Ophthalmol. 2010. V. 2. (4). P. 138–144.
  • Gwiazda J., Thorn F., Bauer J., Held R. Emmetropization and the progression of manifest refraction in children followed from infancy to puberty // Clin. Vis. Sci. 1993. V. 8. (3). P. 337–344.
  • Hirsh M.J. Relation of visual acuity in myopia // Arch. Ophthalmol. 1945. V. 34. P. 418–421.
  • Raviola E., Wiesel T.N. An animal model of myopia // New England J. Medicine. 1985. V. 312. (25). P. 1609– 1615.
  • Smith G. Relation between spherical refractive error and visual acuity // Optom. Vis. Sci. 1991. V. 68. (8). P. 591–598.
  • Wood I.C.J., Hodi S., Morgan L. Longitudinal change of refractive error in infants during the first year of life // Eye. 1995. (9). P. 551–557.